On Mar 9 2006, Ed Kenschaft wrote:
> In my circle, the most common term might be "scarce-resource
> languages". (We got tired of explaining to people that the meaning of
> "low density" had nothing to do with density.) The term gets at the
> idea that a language might be spoken by a lot of people, but still not
> have a lot of computational resources available (e.g. Hindi, Urdu).
I like your term much better (and I totally empathize with the problem of
explaining "low density").
Mike Maxwell
CASL
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 09 2006 - 18:37:39 MET