Could the term possibly refere to "lesser languages still in use" as
opposed to "lesser languages which are not used today"? :-)
/Markus
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:42:17 -0000, Somers, Harold
<harold.somers@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Sorry for cross-posting, but I just saw an announcement for a conference on "Lesser Used Languages & Computer Linguistics", which looks like an interesting conference, but (the point of this posting), does anyone else cringe when they see "lesser used"? Shouldn't it be "less used"?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 11 2005 - 15:51:06 MET