Re: [Corpora-List] Lesser (sic) used languages

From: Markus Saers (masaers@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 11 2005 - 15:50:49 MET

  • Next message: Mike Maxwell: "Re: [Corpora-List] Morphological Analyser for Setswana"

    Could the term possibly refere to "lesser languages still in use" as
    opposed to "lesser languages which are not used today"? :-)

    /Markus

    On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:42:17 -0000, Somers, Harold
    <harold.somers@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
    > Sorry for cross-posting, but I just saw an announcement for a conference on "Lesser Used Languages & Computer Linguistics", which looks like an interesting conference, but (the point of this posting), does anyone else cringe when they see "lesser used"? Shouldn't it be "less used"?
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 11 2005 - 15:51:06 MET