RE: [Corpora-List] history of corpus linguistics

From: Adam Kilgarriff (adam@lexmasterclass.com)
Date: Sat Jan 06 2007 - 11:10:34 MET

  • Next message: palc@uni.lodz.pl: "[Corpora-List] PALC 2007"

    As well as Corpus Linguistics's "own" history (Brown, LOB, ICAME,
    anti-Chomsky), two external influences need mentioning:

            * lexicography - different agenda but responsible for lots of the
    actual corpus-building work and innovation, at least in UK. BNC was
    lexicography-led.
            * NLP / computational linguistics, which has come into the field
    like a schoolyard bully, forcing everything that's not computational into
    submission, collusion or the margins. For history of this aspect, Church
    and Mercer's Intro to the 1993 Sp Issue of Computational linguistics on
    using large corpora (19 (1)) is great reading

    Adam

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-corpora@lists.uib.no [mailto:owner-corpora@lists.uib.no] On
    Behalf Of Geoffrey Williams
    Sent: 06 January 2007 08:29
    To: Florian Petran
    Cc: CORPORA@uib.no
    Subject: Re: [Corpora-List] history of corpus linguistics

    As far as I know there is no complete and unexpurgated history as yet, b
    ut I very good background is given from in Graeme Kennedy's introduction
    to corpus linguistics. I recently wrote an explanation of the origins
    contextualist corpus linguistics for a French audience, who often seem
    to confuse corpus linguistics and NLP, and also literary analysis with
    quantitive methods. In looking for information John Sinclair pointed me
    in the direction of a very interesting article by Léon (2005) which
    kicks into touch the boring litany of Chomskyan influence on linguistics
    this side of the pond. Given that John was a prime mover in the
    development of corpus studies in the UK, the interview of with Wolfgang
    Teubert in the introduction the recent republication of the OSTI report
    by Ramesh Krishnamurthy (Sinclair et al 2004) is worth reading, as is
    the report itself as it is a good lesson in humility with so much done
    to lay the foundations of current methodology. Another source in the
    same ilk is Sampson and McCarthy (2004) as this has texts from the pre
    computer period as well as some foundational texts that are no longer
    easily available.

    Hope this helps

    Best

    Geoffrey

    *Kennedy G.*1998. /An introduction to corpus linguistics./ London & New
    York: Longman

    *Léon, J*. 2005. ‘Claimed and unclaimed sources of /Corpus
    Linguistics’/. /Henry Sweet Society Bulletin/. N°44. pp.36-50.

    *G. Sampson and D. McCarthy (eds). */Corpus Linguistics: Readings// in a
    widening discipline/. London and New York: Continuum, 2004

    *Sinclair J. McH., Jones S., Daley R.* 2004. /English Collocation
    Studies: The OSTI Report/. Londres - New York : Continuum.

    Geoffrey Williams
    Professeur des Universités en Sciences du Langage
    Université de Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France
    geoffrey.williams@univ-ubs.fr

    Florian Petran a écrit :

    > McEnery/Wilson : Corpus Linguistics. An introduction, Edinburgh: EUP
    > 2005 have a chapter on the topic.
    >
    > Harris: The linguistics wars, Oxford: OUP 1993
    > covers the debate with Chomsky, though does not deal explicitly with
    > corpus linguistics.
    >
    > 2007/1/5, Ronald P. Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>:
    >
    >> Can someone recommend sources for a history of corpus linguistics, and
    >> more specifically string frequency analysis?
    >>
    >> Right now I have:
    >>
    >> Hockney, Susan, 2000. Electronic Texts in the Humanities Oxford
    >> University Press
    >>
    >>
    >> Thanks.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 06 2007 - 11:07:57 MET