Re: [Corpora-List] Google searches as linguistic evidence

From: Geoffrey Sampson (grs2@sussex.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 07 2006 - 17:14:16 MET

  • Next message: Roger Shlomo Harris: "Re: [Corpora-List] Numpties and bennies: Google searches as linguistic evidence"

    An amazing experience I had a few years ago was being asked in all
    seriousness by one of my part-time researchers whether "a bad egg" or
    "an bad egg" was correct. With another part of his time he worked for a
    company alongside another man who had to do some documentation and
    insisted that the correct form was "an bad egg". So far as I could make
    out, this other man (who, like my researcher, was as I understood it a
    native speaker) thought he had learned a rule that "a" v. "an" depends
    on whether the following noun begins with a vowel, and this explicit
    rule overrode in his mind what must surely have been a large weight of
    experience implying that it is not the following noun, but the
    immediately-following word, that matters. The third party was quite
    sure that only "an bad egg" would do in writing; my researcher was
    dubious, but felt he needed my professorial authority to contradict his
    colleague. This seemed to me very striking counter-evidence against the
    idea that native speakers "know" the rules of their language.
    Comparable misunderstandings of the a/an rule might perhaps explain
    sporadic cases of "an w..." written by people who would surely _say_ "a
    w..." when they were speaking spontaneously, without thinking about
    language issues.

    Geoffrey Sampson

     
    ............................................................
         Prof. Geoffrey Sampson MA PhD MBCS CITP ILTM

         author of "The 'Language Instinct' Debate"

         Department of Informatics, University of Sussex
         Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, England

         www.grsampson.net +44 1273 678525
    ............................................................



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2006 - 17:12:46 MET