Re: [Corpora-List] Google searches as linguistic evidence

From: Ramesh Krishnamurthy (r.krishnamurthy@aston.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 07 2006 - 15:41:32 MET

  • Next message: maxwell@ldc.upenn.edu: "Re: [Corpora-List] Google searches as linguistic evidence"

    Hi Diana

    I don't know of many websites who use professional proof-readers,
    whereas most book publishers used to
    use them (I don't know what the current situation is, but I certainly
    notice more typos in recently published
    books than in the past). Newspapers use copy-editors, part of whose
    function I think is to proof-read.

    I have certainly noticed, at several of the academic institutions I
    have been involved with, that time pressures
    have increased, and so 'tolerance levels' for typos and poor wordings
    in all forms of documentation (apart from
    research papers, perhaps) are increasing. Also different people often
    key/amend/upload the final version of
    webpages, and don't have time to refer changes back to the
    document-originator for approval...

    And "cutting and pasting" creates quite a few errors, automatic
    processes such as spellcheckers create others,
    and above all I think a major problem of computer-dominated writing
    is version control: people tend to keep so many
    versions of documents, that inevitably the wrong one is often
    selected for onward distribution...

    Best
    Ramesh

    At 13:33 07/12/2006, Diana Maynard wrote:

    >Ramesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
    >>I suspect many are typos. People are far less fussy about
    >>proof-reading website information..
    >Is this a fact, or just a gut reaction?
    >Obviously it differs depending what type of material we're talking
    >about - blogs are much more likely to contain typos and spelling
    >mistakes etc. But if we're talking factual websites, are people less
    >fussy about proofreading? I'm not sure that my gut feeling is the
    >same, but no doubt there is evidence.
    >If we use the whole web as a corpus, clearly there will be more
    >mistakes than in e.g. the BNC, that's my point about having to weed
    >out the rubbish if you do want to use the web as a reliable source.
    >
    >Diana
    >
    >
    >

    Ramesh Krishnamurthy

    Lecturer in English Studies, School of Languages and Social Sciences,
    Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
    [Room NX08, North Wing of Main Building] ; Tel: +44 (0)121-204-3812 ;
    Fax: +44 (0)121-204-3766
    http://www.aston.ac.uk/lss/staff/krishnamurthyr.jsp

    Project Leader, ACORN (Aston Corpus Network): http://corpus.aston.ac.uk/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2006 - 15:39:12 MET