Re: [Corpora-List] license question

From: Emmanuel PROCHASSON (eprochasson@free.fr)
Date: Mon Aug 21 2006 - 15:43:36 MET DST

  • Next message: Andy Roberts: "Re: [Corpora-List] license question"

    Rayson, Paul a écrit :
    > Hi,
    >
    > The "Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives" and "Attribution
    > Non-commercial Share Alike" are suitable for non-commercial use:
    >
    > http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses
    >
    > Does anyone have any experience of using these CC types for academic
    > licensees alongside commercial licences for non-academic licensees? I'm
    > thinking, picking an example at random, of a creative commons licence
    > for a semantic lexicon which academic users can use for free alongside
    > something where commercial users come and talk to us separately for
    > licensing.

    hi,
    I am new to this list, but I am familiar to those licence question (as a
    regular wikipedia contributor and a free software adept).

    The Non-derivatives part of the license is dangerous to me, as it means
    that nobody would be able to contribute to your lexicon, and nobody
    could use it in another free (as in freedom) project, since a part of
    the project cant be derivate.

    The Non-commercial license is dangerous too, since you can't really see
    where is the line between fair use and commercial use.

    Those licenses are not "free" (as in freedom) license to me.

    I think I understand your purpose, and I advise you to use a GFDL
    licence since it means :
    * everybody can use it
    * everybody can contribute to it
    * everybody can distribute it
    * nobody can take it for itself : one can add his name to the list of
    contributor of the lexicon, but not remove yours
    * nobody can use it in a non-free project, as including a GFDL project
    in a larger project means the larger is GFDL. So a commercial use of
    your lexicon implies the result is all GFDL and everybody would be able
    to use it and distribute it, free or not (as in free beer). That also
    means for example that everyone using wikipedia contents in their
    documentation (or teaching) *must* make it GFDL and cite original source.

    I hope this is clear, my english speaking is not that good.

    -- 
    Emmanuel Prochasson
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 21 2006 - 16:02:36 MET DST