Re: [Corpora-List] Google Books, copyrights, and corpora

From: Doug Cooper (doug@th.net)
Date: Thu Jun 15 2006 - 05:23:44 MET DST

  • Next message: Jean-Phi: "Re: [Corpora-List] Google Books, copyrights, and corpora"

    Gosh ... am I the only reader who thinks that the AAP intentionally
    lays out its case:

    http://publishers.org/press/pdf/40%20McGraw-Hill%20v.%20Google.pdf

    in a manner that makes it irrelevant to the use of texts in research
    corpora? After all, the cornerstone of AAP's argument, repeated in
    almost every paragraph of the complaint, is that Google's goal is
    strictly commercial, even to the point of using the scanned copies
    to "pay" for borrowing the originals (paragraph 6).

       Although this argument is clearly meant to undermine a fair-use
    defense by Google, it's pretty hard to see it being applied to corpus
    research. One could claim that simply buying and copying a complete
    text is inherently infringing, but it ain't -- no more than buying,
    reading, and then going out and _reselling_ a text is (see
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobbs-Merrill_Co_v._Straus ). The
    actual use of the copyrighted material has to infringe as well,
    and the fair use guidelines are intentionally written in a manner
    that ensures that this case must be made.

       The parallel to Napster is also hard to see. Taking a work apart,
    then providing an automatic process to put it back together again,
    clearly tries to make an end run around the law. But quite simple
    limitations on corpus sample-serving (e.g. not allowing samples to
    run over paragraph boundaries, and/or not identifiying samples with
    their specific sources) would make it impossible for any number of
    14-year-old Python scripters to reconstitute the original texts.

       Bottom line, establishing that research applications of text corpora
    is fair use is not a matter of 'snippet' defenses, and won't rise or fall
    with Google. Rather, it's that our use and citation of text samples for
    analytical purposes has little or nothing to do with the protection they
    are given as creative literary works. And, as I've said before, I think
    it's incumbent on us as a research community to help make this clear.

        Be well,
        Doug Cooper
    _______________________________________________
    http://sealang.net http://crcl.th.net
    CRCL Inc is a US 501(c)3 nonprofit organization



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2006 - 05:40:46 MET DST