>
> Sigrun's argument really relies on that status - if it
> didn't, there would be an awful lot of minority languages in
> (for example) London.
>
Well there ARE a lot of minority languages in London. We use the term
"ethnic minority" so why shouldn't the language(s) that they speak be
"minority language(s)"?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 09 2006 - 14:13:22 MET