Re: [Corpora-List] 'Standard European English' ?

From: MARC FRYD (marc.fryd@univ-poitiers.fr)
Date: Thu Mar 02 2006 - 17:18:10 MET

  • Next message: William Fletcher: "Re: [Corpora-List] 'Standard European English' ? Web Corpus-building tools"

    Oops!Tthe remarks stand for French, of course!
    Marc

    MARC FRYD wrote:

    >
    > Hi,
    > The comma is only rightly used for decimal numbers: "100,05", where
    > English usage requires a point: "100.05".
    > The comma is regarded as incorrect (though more and more frequent,
    > probably under the influence of Excel, and similar programmes) to mark
    > thousands, and correct usage requires a space: "1 000,05"
    > or "1 000 000,05"
    > With best regards.
    > Marc FRYD
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Briony Williams wrote:
    >
    >> Somers, Harold wrote:
    >>
    >>> Using "eventual(ly)" to mean "if it happens" rather than "final"
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> I believe this is from the German "eventuell".
    >>
    >>> Using "resp." as an abbreviation to mean either "respectively" or
    >>> "and/or" (as in "tea resp. coffee").
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> I believe this is from the usage of the German "beziehungsweise".
    >>
    >>> I look forward to seeing this list expanded and/or (or should I say
    >>> resp.) answers to your other questions.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> More generally:
    >>
    >> The use of the comma to indicate the decimal point, such as "3,142"
    >> instead of "3.142" (pi). This follows French and German usage.
    >>
    >> The use of the period/full stop instead of the comma to indicate
    >> "thousands", such as 1.000 instead of 1,000 for "one thousand".
    >> Again, this follows French and German usage.
    >>
    >> The combination of the above usages can be very confusing for a
    >> British person!
    >>
    >> Best regards
    >>
    >> Briony Williams
    >>
    >





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 02 2006 - 17:18:36 MET