Many thanks, Bruce & Simon, for your pointers.
Bruce, to clarify: I'm not looking to establish strictly one-to-one
correspondences between graphemes and phonemes as these don't always exist.
Rather, I an looking for a pre-compiled lexicon, if there is such, that will
tell me that, in a word like 'flood' (grapheme)f=(phoneme)f; l=l; oo=uh;
d=d. In other words, a lexicon that spells out the one-to-one; one-to-many;
many-to-one or one-to-none correspondences between graphemes and phonemes.
As I mentioned in my initial query, the lexicons I've seen so far simply
list the phonemes making up a word without specifying the exact graphemic
equivalent(s) of each phoneme.
If anyone knows of a pre-compiled lexicon of the sort I'm looking for, I'd
be most grateful to hear of it. In the meantime, I'll follow up on the
references I've received so far.
Ngoni
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 19 2005 - 16:22:58 MET DST