Dear Robin,
The trouble with word sense disambiguation is word senses. They just won't
behave.
Sometimes, the best that a human can do is to say that a corpus instance is
related to more than one word sense (so it is tagged with multiple sense
tags) or that it is unassignable (U) or that it is like one of the senses in
one way but not in others (combination of U and one or more regular sense
tag.) This is the scheme we have used for English for all three Sensevals,
you can find descriptions in the SENSEVAL 1 Special Issue of Computers and
the Humanities 34 (1-2) amongst other places, here are links to papers that
discuss it
Best
Adam
2000 (with Joseph Rosenzweig) "English Framework and Results
<http://www.lexmasterclass.com/people/Publications/2000-KilgRosenzweig-Sense
val1frame.pdf> ." Computers and the Humanities 34 (1-2), Special Issue on
SENSEVAL.
2000 (with Martha Palmer) Introduction to the Special Issue on SENSEVAL
<http://www.lexmasterclass.com/people/Publications/2000-KilgPalmer-Senseval1
Intro.pdf> . Computers and the Humanities 34 (1-2). (Also guest editors for
the Special Issue)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-corpora@lists.uib.no [mailto:owner-corpora@lists.uib.no] On
Behalf Of Yuanyong Wang
Sent: 09 May 2005 07:34
To: corpora@uib.no
Subject: [Corpora-List] About multiple sense tags used in the answer key
file of Senseval
Dear list memebers, I'm a research student doing research on NLP,
word sense disambiguation in particular. I am planning to conduct
experiment on the Senseval-3 data. But after reading the answer key file,
one fact appears a bit confusing, sometimes for one test case, multiple
sense
tags are given, and one of the multiple sense tags could be simply a
letter "U". I tried and looked into the documentation, but haven't found
any relevant information. Could anyone kindly tell me how to make sense
of those multiple sense tag cases or probably point me to the relevant
documentation?
Regards
Robin.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 09 2005 - 15:04:30 MET DST