[Corpora-List] Hierarchy of language taxons in corpora

From: Yuri Tambovtsev (yutamb@mail.cis.ru)
Date: Tue Apr 19 2005 - 20:46:11 MET DST

  • Next message: Anssi Yli-Jyra: "[Corpora-List] Extension of FSMNLP 2005 deadline: May 9"

    Dear Corpora colleagues, it is very important to keeep to the correct language taxon hierarchy in corpora of different sorts. Please, inform me what language taxon hierarchy do you advise me to keep to?
       In my opinion hierarchy of the language subgroups, groups, families and other language taxons is one of the most global, central, important and leading in linguistics. However, linguistics journals do not bother to publish the articles on this burning question.This is why, I'd like to ask you to share with me your opinion on the hierarchy of the language taxons. Or may be, you know a journal which could publish my article on the most global, central, important and leading problem of linguistics? That is the burden of the upper class journal. I noticed that monor and special linguistic journals do not bother to publish articles on general problems of linguistics. In my opinion, we should discuss the most general and
    burning linguistic issues online. There are some problems which can only be solved and are to be
    solved by the community of world linguists. It could be done with the help of a discussion online or in some linguistic journal.
       I think that linguistics lacks a strict, proper and unambiguous
    definition of the hierarchy of the sets of languages, which are
    usually called language branches, subgroups, groups and families. In other words, linguistics lacks
    the establishment of the strict, proper and unanimously accepted
    ordered series of language taxons. In my mind, this series hierarchy
    should begin with the smallest language taxon (like "a branch of
    languages") and the biggest one (like "a community of languages").
    Thus, we can propose to discuss in your journal the hierarchy of the
    language taxons. By the smallest language taxon we mean the
    language taxon, which includes the least number of languages. The
    languages in this taxon must be closely connected or related either
    genetically, or typologically. It is quite logical to begin with the
    notion of a branch since it is the smallest language taxon. Actually,
    the smallest is the tightest and the most compact language taxon.
    Therefore, the biggest language taxon ("community of languages")
    may be the loosest or the least compact one.
       In fact, we propose to define the following ordered series:
    branch;
    subgroup;
    group;
    family;
    unity;
    phylum;
    union;
    community.
    Let us see how interested the world linguists are in establishing good
    order in linguistics. Are there any volunteers to discuss the hierarchy
    of language taxons? If so, please, share your opinions with us
    sending your e-mails to yutamb@hotmail.com Remain yours most sincerely
    Yuri Tambovtsev, Novosibirsk Pedagogical University,
    Novosibirsk, Russia



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 19 2005 - 21:02:08 MET DST