[Corpora-List] how many formulaic sequences can you find? Responses to 2 comment s

From: John Mckenny (john.mckenny@unn.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 18:16:15 MET

  • Next message: default: "Re: [Corpora-List] lemmatizer for spanish"

     COMMENT 1
    Dear Joe
    Thanks for this clarifying question.
    I'd like to capture both kinds: (1)FSs a lot of which can be found in
    dictionaries, lexicons or collocational dictionaries and many of which are
    known by a good number of native English speakers (I know that's vague)and
    (2)those sequences which appear to result from attempts by non-native
    speakers of English to reproduce such FSs or which result from loan
    translations calquing on the mother tongue.
    Examples of (2) found among Portuguese writers in English are the frequently
    recurrent sequences "in what concerns" and "in our days"
    In my original posting I should have asked for the respondent's L1 and L2s
    as this will affect the discernibility of such calques. If anyone still
    intends to reply, could they state their L1(s) and L2(s).
    I suggest an arbitrary deadline of 17 March but answers arriving after that
    will be incorporated if at all possible.
    Thanks
    John
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Joseph Lavallee [mailto:lavallee@mcu.edu.tw]
    Sent: 01 March 2005 16:12
    To: John Mckenny
    Subject: RE: [Corpora-List] how many formulaic sequences can you find?

    Do you mean FSs that I think exist for many native English speakers or FSs
    that the author has incorporated into his mental lexicon (which may not be
    common - or even acceptable - for native speakers)?

    Joe Lavallee

    COMMENT 2

    Dear John
     Thank you for your searching comment. You touch here on the degrees of
    fixedness of FSs. I take the hedge within the definition <is, or appears to
    be, prefabricated> as allowing creative or deliberate or accidental
    variation. If we can still recognize the pattern within which
    substitution(s) were made then the sequence will appear to some of us as
    formulaic. Examples of different kinds of variation abound e.g.
     a piece of the action vs. a slice of the action;
    at least, at the least, at the very least;
     add fuel to the fire, fuel the fire, throw fuel on the fire;
    at all events, at any event;
    take the biscuit, take the cake.
    Not to mention the many creative exploitations of catchphrases, book, play
    and film titles etc used in Newspaper headlines, e.g:
    Burning questions on tunnel safety unanswered (About the possibility of
    fires in the Channel tunnel)
    Science friction (About an argument between scientists and the British
    government on the topic of BSE or mad cow disease)
     Return to gender (About a reoccurrence of sexual harassment in London post
    offices)
    Dutch take courage and prepare for the Euro (About the introduction of the
    Euro into the Netherlands)
    No flies on this heart-stopper (A review of the play The Lord of the Flies).

    On a whinge and a prayer (On the resignation of a minister of the British
    government)
    Officials say atoll do nicely (About the fraudulent sale of small Pacific
    islands)

    So, definitely allowing for variation.
    Best wishes
    John

    Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:01:21 -0500
    From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa_AT_bestweb.net>
    To: John Mckenny <john.mckenny_AT_unn.ac.uk>
    Cc: "'CORPORA_AT_HD.UIB.NO'" <CORPORA_AT_HD.UIB.NO>
    Subject: [Corpora-List] how many formulaic sequences can you find?
    Reply-To: corpora-archive_AT_uib.no

    That definition, as stated, seems to allow only verbatim repetitions of
    fixed phrases:

    > a sequence, continuous or discontinuous, of words or > other elements,
    which is, or appears to be, prefabricated:
    > that is, stored and retrieved whole from memory at the > time of use,
    rather than being subject to generation or > analysis by the language
    grammar.
    > (Wray, 2002:9).

    The literature on formulaic elements in oral poetry normally allows
    substitution of words with the same prosodic patterns and the same syntactic
    category.

    Allowing substitutions gives you a template-style of grammar, which is much
    richer than fixed phrases, yet more restricted than even a finite-state
    grammar.

    John Sowa

    ====
    This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and
    confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take
    no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail
    to highlight the error. You should also be aware that all electronic mail
    from, to, or within Northumbria University may be the subject of a request
    under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and related legislation, and
    therefore may be required to be disclosed to third parties.
    This e-mail and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving
    Northumbria University. Northumbria University will not be liable for any
    losses as a result of any viruses being passed on.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 18:13:54 MET